ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Impact of seat position on survival outcomes and anatomically specific severe injury patterns in four-wheeled motor vehicle accidents: a retrospective cohort study at a community emergency department in Japan.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoad traffic accidents are a major healthcare concern worldwide. To improve outcomes for patients injured in motor vehicle crashes, it is crucial to understand the factors associated with mortality and anatomically specific injury severity. Seat position is one of the possible determinants of road traffic injury fatality; however, evidence regarding which seat positions are linked to impaired survival outcomes and anatomically severe injuries remains scarce.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients injured in four-wheeled vehicle accidents between 2000 and 2022 and admitted to a community teaching hospital in Japan. Seat position was classified as driver seat, front passenger seat, or rear passenger seat. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes included severe trauma, defined as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15, and anatomically specific severe injuries of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥ 3.
resultsAmong 5,906 eligible patients, 4,104 (69.5%) were driver seat occupants, 1,009 (17.1%) were front passenger seat occupants, and 793 (13.4%) were rear passenger seat occupants. After adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, admission year, season, presentation time, presentation day, prehospital length of stay, vehicle configuration, collision type, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, and involvement in high-energy trauma using logistic regression analysis, rear passenger seat occupants had a lower risk of hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.216-0.727) and a lower risk of severe trauma with an ISS of > 15 (AOR, 0.428; 95% CI, 0.308-0.596) than driver seat occupants. Additionally, rear seat occupants were less likely to sustain serious injuries to the chest (AOR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.333-0.673) and abdominal or pelvic contents (AOR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.218-0.639) than driver seat occupants.
conclusionOur results suggest that driver seat occupants require special attention because of their higher risk of adverse outcomes and anatomically severe injuries. These findings will be useful for vehicle occupants, emergency medical professionals, and automobile manufacturers. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.