ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
CYCLONE: recycle contrastive learning for integrating single-cell gene expression data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCombining single-cell transcriptome sequencing results from several batches reduces batch effect, which improves our understanding of cellular identity and function.
resultsThis paper introduces CYCLONE, a new method for integrating single-cell gene expression data using a recycle contrastive learning network. The contrastive learning network and the VAE model work together to jointly train the low-dimensional representations. Additionally, they update the indices of inter-batch MNN pairs to generate positive pairs from a reduced-noise low-dimensional space. Meanwhile, CYCLONE cyclically updates the MNN pairs by iteratively training the low-dimensional space to gradually improve the confidence of the positive sample pairs, and augments the MNN pairs with KNN pairs to identify batch-specific cell types, thus avoiding the problems associated with overcorrecting for the batch effect. The performance of CYCLONE was evaluated on simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets, confirming its ability to improve clustering accuracy while successfully eliminating batch effects. In addition, experiments on batch-specific cell types identification validated CYCLONE's ability to retain batch-specific information while eliminating batch effect, thus preserving batch-specific cell types.
conclusionCYCLONE is an effective integration method based on recycle contrastive learning that improves the accuracy of cell clustering while successfully eliminating batch effects and preserving batch-specific information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.