Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739171›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

CYCLONE: recycle contrastive learning for integrating single-cell gene expression data.

Han Ji, Xinwei He, Hongwei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Han Ji *School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China.
Xinwei He *School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China.
Hongwei LiSchool of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China. hwli@cug.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.42274172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining single-cell transcriptome sequencing results from several batches reduces batch effect, which improves our understanding of cellular identity and function.

resultsThis paper introduces CYCLONE, a new method for integrating single-cell gene expression data using a recycle contrastive learning network. The contrastive learning network and the VAE model work together to jointly train the low-dimensional representations. Additionally, they update the indices of inter-batch MNN pairs to generate positive pairs from a reduced-noise low-dimensional space. Meanwhile, CYCLONE cyclically updates the MNN pairs by iteratively training the low-dimensional space to gradually improve the confidence of the positive sample pairs, and augments the MNN pairs with KNN pairs to identify batch-specific cell types, thus avoiding the problems associated with overcorrecting for the batch effect. The performance of CYCLONE was evaluated on simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets, confirming its ability to improve clustering accuracy while successfully eliminating batch effects. In addition, experiments on batch-specific cell types identification validated CYCLONE's ability to retain batch-specific information while eliminating batch effect, thus preserving batch-specific cell types.

conclusionCYCLONE is an effective integration method based on recycle contrastive learning that improves the accuracy of cell clustering while successfully eliminating batch effects and preserving batch-specific information.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisAnimalsAutoencoderComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicHumansMiceBatch effectIntegrationRecycle contrastive learningscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40739171
PMCPMC12312599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.