ArticleScientific reports2025
Contrastive learning-driven framework for neuron morphology classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPCNNet: spiking point cloud neural network for morphological neuron classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Information flow drives localized morphological differences across neuronal and glial cell types.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Hippocampome.org, a resource for subicular neuron types and beyond.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Neuron morphology classification is a critical task in neuroscience research, as the morphological features of neurons are closely linked to the functional characteristics of neural circuits. However, traditional classification methods often struggle with the complexity and diversity of neuronal morphologies. To address this, we propose PRT-net, a network architecture specifically designed for neuron morphology classification. By incorporating innovative data augmentation strategies and a contrastive learning framework, PRT-net effectively improves classification performance and model generalization. PRT-net leverages Complex Residual Structures and TreeLSTM to efficiently model the local features and global dependencies of neuron morphology. To address issues of data scarcity and imbalance, we designed a tailored data augmentation strategy that simulates diverse morphological variations, enhancing model robustness. Experiments conducted on three public datasets-BIL, JML, and ACT-demonstrate that PRT-net achieves classification accuracies of 78.45%, 67.11%, and 58.95%, respectively, significantly surpassing existing state-of-the-art methods. Notably, it achieves improvements of 2.9 and 3.3 percentage points on the JML and ACT datasets, respectively. Through the introduction of multiple evaluation metrics, we comprehensively analyze the classification and clustering performance of the model, validating its strong adaptability to complex data distributions. This study provides an efficient solution for neuron morphology classification, advancing research in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.