ArticleScientific data2025
High-Resolution Ultrasound Data for AI-Based Segmentation in Mouse Brain Tumor.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRISC: Annotated Dataset for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification.Scientific data · 2026Article
- On the public dissemination and open sourcing of ultrasound resources, datasets and deep learning models.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Ultrasound Data for AI-Based Segmentation in Mouse Brain Tumor.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Advances in tumor-associated macrophage-mediated chemotherapeutic resistance in glioma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of brain cancer, making effective treatments essential to improve patient survival. To advance the understanding of GBM and develop more effective therapies, preclinical studies commonly use mouse models due to their genetic and physiological similarities to humans. In particular, the GL261 mouse glioma model is employed for its reproducible tumor growth and ability to mimic key aspects of human gliomas. Ultrasound imaging is a valuable modality in preclinical studies, offering real-time, non-invasive tumor monitoring and facilitating treatment response assessment. Furthermore, its potential therapeutic applications, such as in tumor ablation, expand its utility in preclinical studies. However, real-time segmentation of GL261 tumors during surgery introduces significant complexities, such as precise tumor boundary delineation and maintaining processing efficiency. Automated segmentation offers a solution, but its success relies on high-quality datasets with precise labeling. Our study introduces the first publicly available ultrasound dataset specifically developed to improve tumor segmentation in GL261 glioblastomas, providing 1,856 annotated images to support AI model development in preclinical research. This dataset bridges preclinical insights and clinical practice, laying the foundation for developing more accurate and effective tumor resection techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.