Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739107›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2025

The precision of attention selection during reward learning influences the mechanisms of value-driven attention.

Oudeng Jia, Qingsong Tan, Sihan Zhang, Ke Jia, Mengyuan Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oudeng Jia *Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qingsong Tan *Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Sihan ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ke JiaThe State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Mengyuan GongDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. gongmy426@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University 226-2024-00118National Natural Science Foundation of China 32300855National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371087National Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Project 2021ZD0200409Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-PT310-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward-predictive items capture attention even when task-irrelevant. While value-driven attention typically generalizes to stimuli sharing critical reward-associated features (e.g., red), recent evidence suggests an alternative generalization mechanism based on feature relationships (e.g., redder). Here, we investigated whether relational coding of reward-associated features operates across different learning contexts by manipulating search mode and target-distractor similarity. Results showed that singleton search training induced value-driven relational attention regardless of target-distractor similarity (Experiments 1a-1b). In contrast, feature search training produced value-driven relational attention only when targets and distractors were dissimilar, but not when they were similar (Experiments 2a-2c). These findings indicate that coarse selection training (singleton search or feature search among dissimilar items) promotes relational coding of reward-associated features, while fine selection (feature search among similar items) engages precise feature coding. The precision of target selection during reward learning thus critically determines value-driven attentional mechanisms.

Identifiers

PMID40739107
PMCPMC12311181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.