Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Refined prognostication of pathological complete response in breast cancer using radiomic features and optimized InceptionV3 with DCE-MRI.

Satyabrata Pattanayak, Tripty Singh, Rishabh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satyabrata PattanayakDepartment of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560067, India.
Tripty SinghDepartment of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560067, India. tripty_singh@blr.amrita.edu.
Rishabh KumarRadiation Oncology, Amrita Hospital, Faridabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant therapy plays a pivotal role in breast cancer treatment, particularly for patients aiming to conserve their breast by reducing tumor size pre-surgery. The ultimate goal of this treatment is achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR), which signifies the complete eradication of cancer cells, thereby lowering the likelihood of recurrence. This study introduces a novel predictive approach to identify patients likely to achieve pCR using radiomic features extracted from MR images, enhanced by the InceptionV3 model and cutting-edge validation methodologies.

methodsIn our study, we gathered data from 255 unique Patient IDs sourced from the -SPY 2 MRI database with the goal of classifying pCR (pathological complete response). Our research introduced two key areas of novelty.Firstly, we explored the extraction of advanced features from the dcom series such as Area, Perimeter, Entropy, Intensity of the places where the intensity is more than the average intensity of the image. These features provided deeper insights into the characteristics of the MRI data and enhanced the discriminative power of our classification model.Secondly, we applied these extracted features along with combine pixel array of the dcom series of each patient to the numerous deep learning model along with InceptionV3 (GoogleNet) model which provides the best accuracy. To optimize the model's performance, we experimented with different combinations of loss functions, optimizer functions, and activation functions. Lastly, our classification results were subjected to validation using accuracy, AUC, Sensitivity, Specificity and F1 Score. These evaluation metrics provided a robust assessment of the model's performance and ensured the reliability of our findings.

resultsThe successful combination of advanced feature extraction, utilization of the InceptionV3 model with tailored hyperparameters, and thorough validation using cutting-edge techniques significantly enhanced the accuracy and reliability of our pCR classification study. By adopting a collaborative approach that involved both radiologists and the computer-aided system, we achieved superior predictive performance for pCR, as evidenced by the impressive values obtained for the area under the curve (AUC) at 0.91 having an accuracy of .92.

conclusionOverall, the combination of advanced feature extraction, leveraging the InceptionV3 model with customized hyperparameters, and rigorous validation using state-of-the-art techniques contributed to the accuracy and credibility of our pCR classification study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRadiomicsContrast MediaBreast cancerDeep learningImage analyticsInception V3MCCpCR

Identifiers

PMID40739101
PMCPMC12310950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.