Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739072›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2026

Shortcomings of silhouette in single-cell integration benchmarking.

Pia Rautenstrauch, Uwe Ohler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unsupervised clustering of electroclinical features in temporal lobe epilepsy: A data-driven approach.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Stack: In-Context Learning of Single-Cell Biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pia RautenstrauchMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-4759
Uwe OhlerMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Berlin, Germany. uwe.ohler@mdc-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-3116

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) IRTG2403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell studies rely on advanced integration methods for complex datasets affected by batch effects from technical factors alongside meaningful biological variation. Silhouette is an established metric for assessing unsupervised clustering results, comparing within-cluster cohesion to between-cluster separation. However, silhouette's assumptions are typically violated in single-cell data integration scenarios. We demonstrate that silhouette-based metrics cannot reliably assess batch effect removal or biological signal conservation and propose more robust evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40739072
PMCPMC13271888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.