Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739064›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

High-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on cerebral energy metabolism in older rats.

Cécile Marcourt, Claudio Rivera, Jürgen Tuvikene, Antoine Langeard, Eli-Eelika Esvald, Florencia Cabrera-Cabrera, Tõnis Timmusk, Jean-Jacques Temprado, Jérôme Laurin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cécile MarcourtAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INMED, Marseille, France.
Claudio RiveraAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INMED, Marseille, France.
Jürgen TuvikeneDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Antoine LangeardNormandie Univ, INSERM, COMETE, Caen, France.
Eli-Eelika EsvaldDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Florencia Cabrera-CabreraDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Tõnis TimmuskDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Jean-Jacques TempradoAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Jérôme LaurinAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INMED, Marseille, France. jerome.laurin@univ-amu.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-0060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is associated with metabolic decline in the brain, increasing susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases. While exercise is a well-established strategy to counteract these changes, no study has directly compared the effects of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cortical and hippocampal energy metabolism-key regulators of brain plasticity in aging. To address this gap, we investigated how 4-week MICT and HIIT protocols, structured according to the lactate threshold, affect endurance performance and brain metabolic markers in older Wistar rats. Both training modalities improved endurance, with HIIT demonstrating superior gains in maximal performance. However, molecular analyses revealed that MICT induced more extensive metabolic and angiogenic adaptations in the cortex and hippocampus, including the upregulation of key regulators of energy metabolism and vascularization. RNA sequencing confirmed broader transcriptomic changes following MICT, implicating pathways associated with neurogenesis, metabolic homeostasis, and cellular plasticity. While HIIT provided a time-efficient means of improving cardiovascular endurance and mitochondrial activity through different molecular pathways when compared to MICT, its impact on brain metabolism was more limited. These findings suggest that MICT is the preferred regimen for enhancing cerebral metabolic function and neurovascular adaptation, while HIIT serves as a complementary strategy to involve other brain metabolism-associated pathways and maximize aerobic fitness. A direct comparison of these modalities, as presented here, is essential for refining exercise prescriptions to support brain health in aging.

Indexed as

AgingBrainCerebral CortexEnergy MetabolismHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHippocampusPhysical Conditioning, AnimalAnimalsMaleNeuronal PlasticityPhysical EnduranceRatsRats, WistarAngiogenic markersBrain healthBulk RNA sequencingCortical and hippocampal energy metabolismLactate threshold

Identifiers

PMID40739064
PMCPMC12972401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.