Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739058›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.

Adrina Kocharian, A David Redish, Patrick E Rothwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deliberating on the role of dopamine.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrina KocharianGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
A David RedishDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-9072
Patrick E RothwellDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. rothwell@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-2510

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
Viral Innovation CoreP30DA048742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KEVIN D WICKMAN · 2020 to 2026
$19.0M
DAT-Regulation of Nucleus Accumbens Microcircuitry by Oxycodone Exposure and WithdrawalR01DA048946 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROTHWELL, PATRICK · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Dopaminergic modulation of nucleus accumbens during prospective and retrospective neuroeconomic decision makingF30MH124404 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Adrine Kocharian · 2021 to 2026
$217k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048742NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048946NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH124404NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) F30MH124404U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) P50MH119569U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01DA048946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleus accumbens dopamine signaling is an important neural substrate for decision-making. Dominant theories generally discretize and homogenize decision-making, when it is in fact a continuous process, with evaluation and re-evaluation components that extend beyond simple outcome prediction into consideration of past and future value. Extensive work has examined mesolimbic dopamine in the context of reward prediction error, but major gaps persist in our understanding of how dopamine regulates volitional and self-guided decision-making. Moreover, there is little consideration of individual differences in value processing that may shape how dopamine regulates decision-making. Here, using an economic foraging task in mice, we found that dopamine dynamics in the nucleus accumbens core reflected decision confidence during evaluation of decisions as well as both past and future value during re-evaluation and change-of-mind. Optogenetic manipulations of mesolimbic dopamine release selectively altered evaluation and re-evaluation of decisions in mice whose dopamine dynamics and behavior reflected future value.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingDopamineIndividualityNucleus AccumbensAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOptogeneticsRewardDopamine

Identifiers

PMID40739058
PMCPMC12951320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.