ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
Predictive efficacy and role of 2HG in MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas: a retrospective study based on MRS and mediator variable analysis.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) in the methylation process of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the predictive efficacy and role of 2HG in MGMT promoter methylation.
methodsPatients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively included and divided into MGMT promoter methylation group (M) and MGMT promoter unmethylation group (UM). 2HG, Glutamate (Glu), N-acetylaspartate (NAA), Choline (Cho), 2HG/Creatine (Cr), 2HG/Glu and Cho/NAA were calculated. Intergroup differences were estimated using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test. Subsequently, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for evaluating diagnostic efficacy of metabolic indices with statistical differences. Then, the causal steps approach was performed for discussing the mediation effect of 2HG.
results75 patients (male: 52, female: 23, age: 46.81 ± 1.52 years) were included (48 in M, 27 in UM). Compared with UM, M exhibited higher 2HG, 2HG/Cr, 2HG/Glu, Cho/NAA and lower Glu, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). 2HG/Glu exhibited the best diagnostic efficacy (area under curve: 0.788, [95%CI: 0.679-0.879]). 2HG is a mediator in the process of MGMT promoter methylation.
conclusions2HG/Glu exhibited the best efficacy in predicting MGMT promoter methylation, and 2HG is a mediator in the methylation process of MGMT promoter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.