ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid deep learning model for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets with class balancing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An ensemble-based sentiment analysis approach for precision medicine recommendation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread dissemination of misinformation and the diverse public sentiment observed during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight the necessity for accurate sentiment analysis of social media discourse. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning (DL) model that integrates Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) for contextual feature extraction with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for sequential learning to classify COVID-19-related sentiments. To enhance data quality, advanced text preprocessing techniques, including Unicode normalization, contraction expansion, and emoji conversion, are applied. Additionally, to mitigate class imbalance, Random OverSampling (ROS) is employed, leading to significant improvements in model performance. Before applying ROS, the model exhibited lower accuracy and inconsistent performance across sentiment categories. After balancing the dataset, accuracy for binary classification increased to 92.10%, with corresponding precision, sensitivity, and specificity of 92.10%, 92.10%, and 91.50%, respectively. For three-class sentiment classification, accuracy improved to 89.47%, with precision, sensitivity, and specificity of 89.80%, 89.47%, and 94.10%, respectively. In five-class sentiment classification, accuracy reached 81.78%, with precision, sensitivity, and specificity of 82.19%, 81.78%, and 95.28%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of combining deep learning-based sentiment analysis with advanced text preprocessing and class balancing techniques for accurately classifying public sentiment related to COVID-19 across multiple sentiment categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.