Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738944›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predictive modeling of oil rate for wells under gas lift using machine learning.

Famin Ma, Farag M A Altalbawy, Pinank Patel, R Manjunatha, Rishiv Kalia, Shoira Formanova, P Raja Naveen, Kamal Kant Joshi, Aashna Sinha, Abdolali Yarahmadi Kandahari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Famin MaShangluo University, Shangluo, 726000, Shannxi, China. mafamin_2007@163.com.
Farag M A AltalbawyDepartment of Chemistry, University College of Duba, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Pinank PatelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi Universitly Research Center,, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
R ManjunathaDepartment of Data analytics and Mathematical Sciences, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Rishiv KaliaCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.
Shoira FormanovaDepartment of Chemistry and Its Teaching Methods, Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
P Raja NaveenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.
Kamal Kant JoshiDepartment of Allied Science, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India.
Aashna SinhaSchool of Applied and Life Sciences, Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Abdolali Yarahmadi KandahariFaculty of Engineering, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan. aliyarahmadiput21@gmail.com.
Taqi Mohammed Khattab Al-RubayeDepartment of computers Techniques engineering, College of technical engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Mohammad Mahtab AlamDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing oil production in wells employing gas lift systems is a critical challenge due to the complex interplay of operational and reservoir parameters. This study aimed to develop robust predictive models for estimating oil production rates using a comprehensive dataset from oil fields in south-eastern Iraq, leveraging advanced machine learning techniques. The dataset, comprised of 169 rigorously validated samples, includes key features such as basic sediment and water content, choke size, pressures, gas injection characteristics, gas lift valve depth, oil density, and temperature. Input and output variables were normalized and split into training and test sets to ensure fairness and reliability. Multiple machine learning models (Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Random Forest, Ensemble Learning, CNN, SVR, MLP-ANN, and Lasso Regression) were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and key statistical metrics (R², MSE, AARE%). The Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a test R² of 0.867 and the lowest prediction errors (MSE: 18502 and AARE: 8.76%) for the testing phase, while other models were prone to overfitting or underfitting. Sensitivity analysis and SHAP interpretability methods revealed that basic sediment and water content, choke size, and upstream pressure had the greatest influence on oil output. These findings underscore the importance of both statistical rigor and model interpretability in oil production forecasting and provide actionable insights for optimizing gas lift operations in oil wells.

Indexed as

Gas liftMachine learningOil production predictionRandom forestSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID40738944
PMCPMC12310997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.