Trial reportScientific reports2025
Access to translated invitations online increases involvement of linguistically diverse households in a population-based study: a cluster randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This double-blind cluster-randomized controlled study examined the effectiveness of a multilingual physical-digital recruitment strategy to increase the involvement of linguistically diverse households in the German sub-survey of the World Health Organization European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative. Students in primary schools received German study invitations either alone or with a supplemental flyer containing a QR-code for accessing translations online. A total of 114 classrooms (2306 students) received the flyer, while 115 classrooms (2276 students) served as control group. Main outcomes were active of responses to invitations and study participation. Response proportions were 48% overall, 48.6% in the flyer and 47.4% in the control group. Participation proportions were 26.7% overall, 27.8% in the flyer and 25.4% (571/2251) in the control groups. The flyer increased the odds of participation (14.9, 95% CI 1.003-1.315), but not the odds of active responses. In medium-social-level schools, response and participation proportions in the flyer group rose by 1.5% (ROR 1.015, 95% CI 1.003-1.027) and by 2% (ROR 1.020, 95% CI 1.005-1.034), respectively, for each percentage point increase in the proportion of non-German speaking households per classroom. The flyer's effect in low- and high-social level schools was inconclusive. Although modest in magnitude, the addition of the flyer increased overall participation and, in particular, the involvement of linguistically diverse households in medium-social-level schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.