ArticleScientific reports2025
Sleep and modern life: a population-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines sleep patterns in Romania, a country where long working hours and significant household responsibilities may impact rest. The study highlights key factors influencing perceived sleep quality, with the aim to offer insights for clinicians. Based on a cross-sectional survey 835 with Romanian respondents by the Francophone Space of Pneumology from 2019 to 2020, the study predates the COVID-19 pandemic and therefore avoids potential post-pandemic sleep disruptions. Participants reported their sleep habits, medical conditions, psychological well-being, and work conditions. The study assesses how these factors relate to sleep quality, sleep duration, insomnia, and sleep disturbances. Multivariate analysis reveals that individual perceptions of sleep quality can be misleading when analyzed in isolation. Through hierarchical models, we identify specific predictors of sleep quality. Multivariate analysis showed that good bedroom conditions (OR = 1.63) and physical activity (OR = 1.45) were associated with better sleep perception. Night shifts, female gender, and co-sleeping with pets (OR = 3.68) increased risk of sleep problems. Medical predictors (e.g., STOP-Bang) were not significantly associated. The results are also presented in a practical dashboard, helping healthcare professionals assess sleep disorders more effectively while identifying potential biases in self-reported sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.