ArticleScientific reports2025
Physiologic model of the cerebrovascular system using supply and demand between arteries and tissues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image-based modeling heavily relies on boundary conditions to obtain realistic blood flow and pressure. For the cerebrovascular system, boundary conditions are derived using in-vivo measurements or geometry-based models such as Murray's law, but these are constrained by the image resolution or high sensitivity to the segmented geometry. We propose a physiologic model of the cerebrovascular system based on a supply and demand relationship between arteries and tissues. Blood flow and perfusion territory are determined by associating brain tissues with nearby vessels using Voronoi tessellation. The model was evaluated for 40 healthy young individuals and two diseased patients, and was validated by comparing the estimated blood flows and perfusion territories against literature data and perfusion imaging. The estimated blood flows are within the physiologically reported values for major cerebral arteries and the predicted perfusion territories are similar to the literature and perfusion imaging. Further, the model demonstrates more robustness to segmentation uncertainties compared to Murray's law. The proposed model is shown to estimate physiologically plausible cerebrovascular blood flow and perfusion territory in a subject-specific manner using medical image data only. It may be used to simulate blood flow more realistically by developing boundary conditions based on this model in the cerebrovascular system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.