Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738914›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced air quality prediction using multimodal data and dynamic modeling techniques.

Umesh Kumar Lilhore, Sarita Simaiya, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Abdullah M Baqasah, Roobaea Alroobaea, Majed Alsafyani, Afnan Alhazmi, M D Monish Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Umesh Kumar LilhoreDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
Sarita SimaiyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, UP, India. saritasimaiya@gmail.com.
Rajesh Kumar SinghEchelon Institute of Technology, Faridabad, India.
Abdullah M BaqasahDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Roobaea AlroobaeaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Majed AlsafyaniDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan AlhazmiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
M D Monish KhanArba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. drkumacse@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate air quality forecasting is critical for human health and sustainable atmospheric management. To address this challenge, we propose a novel hybrid deep learning model that combines cutting-edge techniques, including CNNs, BiLSTM, attention mechanisms, GNNs, and Neural ODEs, to enhance prediction accuracy. Our model uses the Air Quality Open Dataset (AQD), combining data from ground sensors, meteorological sources, and satellite imagery to create a diverse dataset. CNNs extract spatial pollutant patterns from satellite images, whereas BiLSTM networks simulate temporal dynamics in pollutant and weather data. The attention mechanism directs the model's focus to the most informative features, improving predictive accuracy. GNNs encode spatial correlations between sensor locations, improving estimates of pollutants like PM2.5, PM10, CO, and ozone. Neural-ODEs capture the continuous temporal evolution of air quality, offering a more realistic representation of pollutant changes compared to discrete-time approaches. Importantly, we use adaptive pooling, a dynamic operation that optimizes spatial feature reduction while preserving critical information, which sets it apart from traditional fixed pooling layers. This adaptive pooling mechanism reduces computational complexity and results in a 22% reduction in training time, as demonstrated by the experimental results in section 4. Our model thus enables real-time environmental monitoring and large-scale forecasting. The experimental results show superior performance (RMSE = 6.21, MAE = 3.89, and R

Indexed as

Air qualityDeep learningMeteorological dataMultimodalPollutant distributionSatellite imagerySensor data

Identifiers

PMID40738914
PMCPMC12311140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.