ArticleScientific reports2025
Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in public and private facilities of Western Hararghe Zone Ethiopia using WHO framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Insights into Public-Private Sector Variations in Maternal Health Care Utilization in an Urban Slum in Mumbai.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving equitable health and meeting the sustainable development goals commitment of "leaving no woman behind" requires high-quality antenatal care that ensures a positive pregnancy experience. However, limited studies have assessed the quality of antenatal care using the WHO's quality of care framework, encompassing both experience of care and structural dimensions. This cross-sectional study, conducted from September 1 to October 2, 2020, in the Western Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia, examined the quality of antenatal care among 340 participants selected through multistage stratified sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression in SPSS version 27, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results showed that 51.5% [95% CI 46.6-56.8%] of women received quality antenatal care. The domains of effective communication had relatively low quality followed by supportive care then respect, and dignity. The quality of antenatal care was found to be 65.9% and 37.1% in private and public health facilities respectively. Public facilities lacked essential diagnostic equipment, particularly ultrasound. Factors associated with poor antenatal care quality are rural residency, low income, unplanned pregnancies, and public health facilities. Addressing inequities in experience of care coupled with structural attributes is crucial for improving the quality of antenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.