Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Real-world Experience of Embolization for Intracranial Tumors in Japan: Analysis of 2,756 Cases from Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4.
Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter: Real-world Experience of Embolization for Intracranial Tumors in Japan: Analysis of 2,756 Cases from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Reply to the Editor: Real-world Experience of Embolization for Intracranial Tumors in Japan: Analysis of 2,756 Cases from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Preoperative Embolization for Tentorial and Subtentorial Tumors.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embolization of intracranial tumors is predominantly performed in Japan, primarily before neurosurgical resection. The Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) Study Group, established in 2005, aims to clarify the factors influencing the outcomes of neuroendovascular treatment. Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4 is a nationwide, multicenter retrospective observational study that evaluates real-world data on intracranial tumor embolization in Japan. Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4 is based on data collected from 166 neurosurgical centers in Japan between January 2015 and December 2019. Of 63,230 patients, 2,664 (4.2%) with intracranial tumors underwent embolization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 30 days post-procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure-related complications. Among the 2,664 patients, 61 records lacked sufficient data, leaving 2,603 patients (1,612 females, median age: 61 years [interquartile range 51-71]). The proportion of patients with mRS scores ≤2 at 30 days after the procedure was 86.9%. The overall incidence of procedure-related complications was 4.8%, with 1.8% hemorrhagic, 2.0% ischemic, and 1.0% classified as other complications. In the multivariate analysis, general anesthesia and embolization of vessels other than the external carotid artery were identified as risk factors for the development of complications. Meningioma cases had a complication rate of 4.3%, with major complications occurring in 3.5%. Hemangioblastoma cases had a 14.9% complication rate, with major complications at 9.9%. Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 4 provides comprehensive real-world data on intracranial tumor embolization in Japan, identifying risk factors to inform and improve the safe practice of intracranial tumor embolization in neuroendovascular therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.