Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738691›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2026

Perceptions and practices of UK GPs towards youth vaping: a questionnaire-based study.

Elika Najafi, Devan Wasan, Yasmin Baker, Kristian Peters, Dhruv Vasooja, Maneth Warnapala, Mario Martínez-Jiménez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elika NajafiImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK elika.najafi23@alumni.imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1141-5023
Devan WasanImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8132-9201
Yasmin BakerImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-7350
Kristian PetersImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1309-2266
Dhruv VasoojaImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9426-1655
Maneth WarnapalaImperial Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7556-2713
Mario Martínez-JiménezDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-6494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults is a growing public health concern. GPs play a critical role in addressing health behaviours, yet there is limited research on their perceptions and practices towards vaping in young people.

aimTo explore current perceptions and practices among GPs concerning vaping in young people. DESIGN &

settingA quantitative approach was employed through an online, self-administered questionnaire. Responders included both trainee and qualified GPs from across the UK.

methodThe questionnaire consisted of Likert-scale and free-text questions, covering screening, counselling, and demographic information. Participants were recruited through newsletters and social media, with 284 responses collected from March 2024 to August 2024. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess for significant differences based on responders' region of work or level of experience.

resultsGPs rarely enquire about e-cigarette use (23.9%), despite 85.6% believing it is important to do so. Lack of time, relevance to the presenting complaint, and method for quantifying and documentation were cited as factors contributing to low screening rates. Only 27.5% of GPs provide advice to e-cigarette users, likely owing to low rates of confidence (12.3%). A lack of time, understanding of health effects, training, and availability of referral services were cited as factors contributing to low counselling rates. There were no significant variations in responses based on responders' location or level of experience.

conclusionGPs recognise the importance of youth vaping but face barriers to screening and counselling, indicating the need for change in guidelines and policy.

Indexed as

adolescentgeneral practiceprimary health carevapingyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID40738691
PMCPMC13540363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.