Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738644›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Surgical versus non-surgical management of orbital fractures: study protocol for evidence generation of a prospective multicentre observational cohort registry.

Elske M Strabbing, OFx Registry Study Group, Eppo B Wolvius

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03887988 (International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry to Collect Data on Orbital Fractures), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03887988 active not recruitingnot on this map

International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry to Collect Data on Orbital Fractures (OFx), Their Primary and Secondary Treatment and Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAO Innovation Translation CenterRan2019 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsOrbital Fractures, Blow Out Fracture of OrbitArmsPrimary "early" reconstruction, Nonsurgical, Primary "delayed" reconstruction, Secondary reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elske M StrabbingErasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
OFx Registry Study Group
Eppo B WolviusErasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands e.wolvius@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-3497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere remains little consensus or guidelines for the clinical management of traumatic orbital fractures (OFx). The OFx Registry aims to increase real-world clinical evidence for the treatment of OFx via prospective, multicentre, international data collection. The primary objectives of this observational cohort study are (1) to document current treatment practices for and (2) to assess the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical treatment of orbital floor and/or medial wall fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Approximately 300 adult patients presenting with a displaced OFx in the orbital floor and/or medial wall will be enrolled prospectively over a recruitment period of ~36 months. All eligible patients treated either surgically or non-surgically as per routine standard of care will have follow-up assessments at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-treatment. Demographic data, injury details, treatment details and outcome measures will be documented in a cloud-based database. Outcome measures include clinical outcomes (eg, diplopia, extraocular motility, and condition of the eyelid, globe and soft tissues), radiological outcomes from collected images, patient-reported outcomes (eg, Diplopia Questionnaire and the newly developed AO Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) Injury Symptom Battery) and complications. A statistical analysis plan will be prepared before final analysis summarising the descriptive statistics to be used for data assessment. Appropriate research questions and statistical tests may be applied additionally, depending on the availability and quality of data collected. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained before patients were enrolled at each participating site. Patient enrolment followed an informed consent process approved by the responsible ethics committee. Peer-reviewed publications are planned to disseminate the study results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03887988.

Indexed as

Orbital FracturesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRegistriesResearch DesignFractures, BoneOrthopaedic sports traumaORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYTrauma management

Identifiers

PMID40738644
PMCPMC12314983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.