ArticleBMJ open2025
Impact of increased resident preparation time on internal medicine rounds in a tertiary teaching hospital: a time-motion study with a before-and-after comparison.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether postponing daily medical rounds to provide additional preparation time for residents reduces round duration and alters time allocation during rounds, with the hypothesis that increased preparation leads to more efficient rounds without reducing patient contact.
designTime and motion study with a before-and-after comparison.
settingInternal medicine division of Lausanne University Hospital, a Swiss tertiary teaching hospital.
participants75 residents; 60% women; mean age of 29.6 years and 3.0 years of training.
interventionIn 2017, the daily work schedule was reorganised by postponing rounds from 09:00 to 10:00 and moving educational sessions to the afternoon, thereby freeing 90 min to prepare patient cases before rounds. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the duration of rounds and the proportion thereof spent with patients, using computer systems or in discussion with colleagues. Secondary outcomes included the detailed distribution of resident activities during the officially scheduled round period, particularly time dedicated to supervision, teaching and administrative tasks.
resultsRound duration decreased from 142 min per shift (95% CI 128 to 156) in 2015 to 112 min (95% CI 101 to 124) in 2018 (p=0.001). The proportion of round time spent directly with patients remained stable at 47%. Computer use during rounds decreased from 43% to 32% (p<0.001). During the official round period, time allocated to supervision and teaching increased from 12% to 32% (p=0.002), while time spent on administrative tasks decreased from 54% to 41% (p<0.001).
conclusionsPostponing rounds to allow more preparation time was associated with shorter, possibly more efficient rounds, reduced computer use in patient presence and increased supervision and teaching. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN69703381, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69703381 (registration date: 24 April 2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.