Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738631›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Are minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios needed in hospitals? An observational study in British Columbia, Canada.

Karen B Lasater, Heather Brom, Linda H Aiken, Matthew D McHugh

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen B LasaterSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA karenbl@nursing.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-1954
Heather BromSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Linda H AikenSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matthew D McHughSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-0697

Funding

The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate staffing conditions, patient outcomes, quality of care, patient safety and nurse job outcomes in British Columbia (BC), Canada hospitals.

designCross-sectional study of 58 hospitals in BC with surveys of nurses and independent measures of patient outcomes.

setting58 hospitals in BC.

participants6685 hospital-based nurses working in a direct patient care role. EXPOSURES: Hospital-wide and unit-specific patient-to-nurse staffing ratios derived from registered nurse reports of how many patients and how many nurses were on their unit during their last shift worked. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Objective patient outcome measures included the Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (HSMR) and 30-day Readmission Rate, from 2022 to 2023 Canadian Institute for Health Information data. Nurses4All@BC provided data from 2024 using validated items on multiple measures (eg, nurse burnout, missed health breaks, intentions to leave, quality and safety measures such as culture of patient safety, quality of nursing care, missed nursing care).

resultsBurnout (59.4%), missed health breaks (41.7%), job dissatisfaction (36.0%), intentions to leave (19.3%) and patient outcomes (HSMR mean 95.4, median 96.0, range 26-180; readmission rate mean 10.0%, median 9.5%, range 7.9%-13.8%) were high and varied across hospitals. 68.3% of nurses reported there were not enough staff, and 77.3% reported their workloads were unsafe for patients. 60.6% of nurses gave their hospital an unfavourable patient safety rating. More patients per nurse were associated with poorer hospital mortality and readmission rates, poorer job outcomes for nurses, more adverse events for patients, less favourable ratings of quality of care and patient safety, more missed nursing care and poorer ratings of staffing adequacy and management.

conclusionsGiven the variability in staffing, quality and patient outcomes across BC hospitals, the implementation of a minimum nurse-to-patient ratio policy has the potential to improve patient care safety and retention of nurses.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingAdultBritish ColumbiaBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJob SatisfactionMalePatient ReadmissionPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareHealth policyHealth & safetyHealth WorkforceHospitalsNursesQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID40738631
PMCPMC12314935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.