ArticleBMJ open2025
Effectiveness and sustainability of peer support interventions for patients with obesity: a realist synthesis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent economic development and evolving lifestyles have contributed to a global rise in overweight and obesity, which are now acknowledged as critical public health challenges. Previous research examining the effectiveness of peer support interventions for individuals who are overweight or obese has produced inconsistent and sometimes conflicting results. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have suggested a potential association between peer support and reductions in both weight and body mass index. In response to these emerging findings, the present study employs a realist synthesis approach to elucidate the context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations identified in literature that meets stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, thereby addressing the pivotal question: under what conditions can peer support effectively mitigate obesity? This study seeks to clarify the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the efficacy and sustainability of peer support interventions, ultimately informing the development of robust, high-quality obesity management programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study employs a realist synthesis methodology in accordance with the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards. Initially, a preliminary theoretical framework will be developed through a scoping review of grey literature and international project frameworks. Systematic searches in databases-including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP-will be conducted to generate relevant evidence. Qualitative research methods, facilitated by NVivo software, will be used to code and organise the data into themes related to the research context, mechanisms and outcomes, thereby refining the theoretical framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research proposal and its corresponding realist synthesis do not require ethical approval. The study employs a realist synthesis approach to construct a theoretical framework that integrates CMO configurations, thereby elucidating how peer support can effectively and sustainably benefit individuals with obesity. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and formal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024587409.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.