ArticleActa biomaterialia2025
In Vitro and In Vivo biocompatibility study of fluorinated polyphosphazene coatings for blood-contacting medical devices.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust Polyurethane with Ordered Hard Segments and Pendant Fluorinated Chains for Improved Hemocompatibility.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic Polymers: A Narrative Review on Current and Future Strategies for Their Design, Synthesis, and Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implant-induced thromboembolic events are the most common complication of blood contacting medical devices. Coatings are a promising approach to improve the biocompatibility of current biomaterials and devices. Poly[bis(trifluoroethoxy) phosphazene] (TFE) has been demonstrated to be biocompatible, anti-inflammatory, and antithrombogenic as a device coating over the past decades; however, its inherently poor mechanical properties make applications in medical devices challenging, especially regarding potential detachment from devices. Our previous work developed a new fluorinated polyphosphazene, poly[bis(octafluoropentoxy) phosphazene] (OFP), and incorporated allylphenoxy side groups to the P-N backbone to make the polymer crosslinkable (X-OFP). In this study, we applied this X-OFP coating on central venous catheters and investigated the surface properties and biocompatibility of the coatings. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that X-OFP has a similar antithrombogenic performance as TFE, but its mechanical properties including adhesion strength of coating-to-substrate are significantly improved, thereby enhancing the stability of the coating. The success of X-OFP will provide a platform to incorporate other side groups to the polymer backbones and generate new fluorinated polyphosphazene polymers having improved biocompatibility and mechanical properties for coating applications in blood-contacting medical devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Implant-induced thrombosis is a major complication of blood-contacting medical devices. This study demonstrated a new fluorinated polyphosphazene coating suitable for the medical device with the significant improvement of the biocompatibility of catheters. Compared to the traditional fluorinated polyphosphazene coating, poly[bis(trifluoroethoxy) phosphazene] (TFE), crosslinkable poly[bis(octafluoropentoxy) phosphazene] (X-OFP) contains a higher amount of fluorocarbon content with the octafluoropentoxy side group and is crosslinkable with the allylphenoxy side group. TFE and X-OFP were applied on central venous catheters as coatings. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that X-OFP has a similar antithrombogenic performance as TFE, but its mechanical properties including adhesion strength of coating-to-substrate are significantly improved, thereby enhancing the stability of the coating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.