ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2025
Zero Dollar Copay Pharmacy Benefit Decreases Healthcare Expenditures Among Members With Type 2 Diabetes of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana.
Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBlue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana implemented the Zero Dollar Copay (ZDC) program on July 1, 2020. This study aims to evaluate whether the ZDC program can reduce total healthcare expenditures.
methodsBlue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana's medical and pharmacy claims from January 2019 to December 2021 was used in this study, and the index date was July 1, 2020. We identified 7603 continuously enrolled members with type 2 diabetes, including 3045 ZDC-eligible members as the ZDC group and 4558 Administrative Service Only group members as the control group. The primary outcome measure was monthly total healthcare expenditure, which included monthly medical and pharmacy spending. ZDC program's effectiveness was evaluated by a 2-way fixed-effect difference-in-difference regression weighted by odds of propensity scores. The study population was further classified into 3 subgroups based on their baseline use of ZDC-eligible antidiabetic medications: pre-ZDC users, pre-ZDC nonusers, and complex users.
resultsThe ZDC pharmacy benefit was associated with a significant reduction in total healthcare spending of $-121.76 per member per month (PMPM) (P = .002) and medical spending of $-131.50 PMPM (P < .001). For complex users, the ZDC program was associated with reductions of $283.44 PMPM (P = .006) in total healthcare spending and $385.45 PMPM (P < .001) in medical spending, whereas pharmacy spending significantly increased by $102.01 PMPM (P = .022). No significant results were observed for pre-ZDC users and pre-ZDC nonusers.
conclusionsThe ZDC program was effective in reducing total healthcare expenditures among ZDC-eligible members with type 2 diabetes in Louisiana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.