Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40738108›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025

Sparse modeling of interactions enables fast detection of genome-wide epistasis in biobank-scale studies.

Julian Stamp, Samuel Pattillo Smith, Daniel Weinreich, Lorin Crawford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian StampCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: julian_stamp@brown.edu.
Samuel Pattillo SmithDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Population Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Daniel WeinreichCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Lorin CrawfordMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: lcrawford@microsoft.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of computational methods capable of detecting epistasis in biobanks has led to uncertainty about the role of non-additive genetic effects on complex trait variation. The marginal epistasis framework is a powerful approach because it estimates the likelihood of a SNP being involved in any interaction, thereby reducing the multiple testing burden. Current implementations of this approach have failed to scale genome wide in large human studies. To address this, we present the sparse marginal epistasis (SME) test, which concentrates the scans for epistasis to regions of the genome that have known functional enrichment for a quantitative trait of interest. By leveraging the sparse nature of this modeling setup, we develop a statistical algorithm that allows SME to run 10-90 times faster than state-of-the-art epistatic mapping methods. In a study of complex traits measured in 349,411 individuals from the UK Biobank, we show that reducing searches of epistasis to variants in functionally enriched regions facilitates the identification of genetic interactions associated with regulatory genomic elements.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksEpistasis, GeneticGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticAlgorithmsHumansMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Locicomplex traitsepistasislinear mixed modelssparsity

Identifiers

PMID40738108
PMCPMC12461027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.