ArticleNeonatology2025
Neonatal Training across Union of European Medical Specialists Member Countries: A Survey from the Next Generation of Neonatologists.
Article in Neonatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Taking care of critically ill newborn infants is challenging, even more so in the current era of greater use of non-invasive support, leaving limited exposure to learn critical skills. Supporting a growing workforce of neonatologists requires training of doctors with formal curriculums and assessment of skills ensuring delivery of high-quality care. Our aim was to gain an understanding of neonatal trainee experiences regarding current neonatal training across Union of European Medical Specialists (UEMS) member countries. The main focus of this survey was on pulmonology-related skills and decision-making.
methodsA structure online survey was sent via the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) newsletter and targeted national neonatology societies from 35 full and associate member countries of the UEMS. Doctors currently in neonatal subspecialty training or having finished training within the last 3 years were eligible. The survey took place between December 2023 and June 2024. All answers were anonymous.
resultsOne hundred and eight individual responses from 24 countries were received. Trainees were confident in endotracheal intubation and postnatal surfactant administration. Current year of neonatal training was the most strongly associated factor with reported confidence in training requirements and procedures, as opposed to having a formal curriculum. Adequate face to face supervision also affected confidence in decision-making. DISCUSSION: There currently is no "unified" pathway for training, curricula and formal assessments across member countries of the UEMS. Future developments include provision of simulation-based training approaches and collaborative mentorship opportunities in caring for complex respiratory diseases affecting newborns. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.