Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737672›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Short-Form Psychoeducation Videos: Process Development Study.

Louise Turtle, Helen Alexandra Wesson, Simon Williamson, Nathan Hodson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise TurtleWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbett Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom, 44 2476574880.ORCID 0009-0008-6288-1014
Helen Alexandra WessonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbett Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom, 44 2476574880.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-258X
Simon WilliamsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbett Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom, 44 2476574880.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-6446
Nathan HodsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbett Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom, 44 2476574880.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-2260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Every year, around 1.8 million people in the United Kingdom are referred to NHS Talking Therapies, predominantly for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which is the first-line treatment for common affective and anxiety disorders. However, more than a million of these do not complete their course. Supporting this "missing million" to attend and complete CBT is a policy priority. Objective: We aimed to coproduce a series of video resources to help patients better prepare for and complete their CBT sessions. Methods: We structured this project around a development cycle and documented outcomes against the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to ensure transparent intervention reporting. We assembled an interdisciplinary team to undertake an iterative video development process, composed of 3 subteams. An expert contributor subteam of 21 therapists shared their priorities and preferences for video content and style. A creative subteam of 4 members was responsible for scripting, filming, and editing video content. A project management subteam comprising 4 members (2 project managers, 1 designer, and 1 psychiatrist) distilled insights from the expert contributors and shared them with the creative team; they also presented video content to expert contributors and collected feedback. The process was terminated when expert contributors were satisfied that the videos developed could be shared with their patients. Results: We conducted 2 development cycles over 7 months between February and August 2024. In total, we produced 12 short-form videos, each 1 minute 14 seconds to 4 minutes 46 seconds long, across 4 distinct presentation styles (animation, patient narrative, therapist vignette, and expert interview). Videos covered topics such as the format of CBT (eg, why there is work to do between therapy sessions) and the psychological content (the value of developing healthy habits). Between 4 and 11 expert contributors reviewed any given batch of videos. Based on early feedback, we removed checklist formats in favor of positive storytelling, slowed pacing, and added subtitles to ensure readability and reduce cognitive load. The termination condition was achieved; expert contributors agreed to share videos with their patients. Conclusions: We successfully collaborated to produce a series of psychoeducation videos. A major strength of this process was the large number of people from different professional backgrounds involved; this diversity boosted both the validity of the content and the creativeness of the videos. This approach was well-suited to the setting of psychotherapy, where therapists have a detailed understanding of the anxieties and uncertainties of their patients, but we would advise caution in fields where professionals are less attuned to their patients' needs. Support to engage the "missing million" is urgently needed, and psychoeducational videos provide one suitable approach.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPatient Education as TopicVideo RecordingFemaleHumansUnited Kingdomanxiety disordersCognitive Behavioral Therapyco-productiondepressioninterdisciplinary developmentmental healthonline therapypsychoeducationpsychotherapyvideos

Identifiers

PMID40737672
PMCPMC12310185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.