Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737415›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Revealing European-wide ecosystem strategies to drought from space.

Qi Chen, Joris Timmermans, Peter M van Bodegom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi ChenInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-7393
Joris TimmermansInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-1803
Peter M van BodegomInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0771-4500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems are threatened by increasing droughts under climate change. A multitude of plant physiological regulation processes determine the overall drought resistance of ecosystems. So far, these physiological strategies to resist drought are poorly understood at large scales across different ecosystem types because the detection of these physiological regulation processes is mostly limited to in situ measurements on individual plants. In this study, by using high-resolution remote sensing data, we evaluated drought strategies of different ecosystem types throughout Europe by evaluating three key physiological regulation aspects (evapotranspiration, water content, and carbon regulation) based on their associated vegetation attributes. We found that different ecosystem types show divergent responses in these physiological attributes, suggesting different optimization strategies with respect to water saving versus spending, water content stabilizing versus fluctuating, and leaf conserving versus shedding strategies facing drought. These drought strategies from remote sensing provide timely ecosystem response information, facilitating earth system model predictions and aiding the protection against future droughts at large scales.

Indexed as

DroughtsEcosystemClimate ChangeEuropeRemote Sensing TechnologyWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID40737415
PMCPMC12309706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.