Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737339›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning approaches for predicting the link of the global trade network of liquefied natural gas.

Pei Zhao, Hao Song, Guang Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pei ZhaoDepartment of Educational Information Technology, Beijing Union Univeristy, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-1294
Hao SongGuang xi Key Laboratory of Culture and Tourism Smart Technology, Guilin Tourism University, Guilin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5157-1166
Guang LingSchool of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rising geopolitical tensions, predicting future trade partners has become a critical topic for the global community. Liquefied natural gas (LNG), recognized as the cleanest burning hydrocarbon, plays a significant role in the transition to a cleaner energy future. As international trade in LNG becomes increasingly volatile, it is essential to assist governments in identifying potential trade partners and analyzing the trade network. Traditionally, forecasts of future mineral and energy resource trade networks have relied on similarity indicators (e.g., CN, AA). This study employs complex network theory to illustrate the characteristics of nodes and edges, as well as the evolution of global LNG trade networks from 2001 to 2020. Utilizing node and edge data from these networks, this research applies machine learning algorithms to predict future links based on local and global similarity-based indices (e.g., CN, JA, PA). The findings indicate that random forest and decision tree algorithms, when used with local similarity-based indices, demonstrate strong predictive performance. The reliability of these algorithms is validated through the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC). Additionally, a graph attention network model is developed to predict potential links using edge and motif data. The results indicate robust predictive performance. This study demonstrates that machine learning algorithms-specifically random forest and decision tree-outperform in predicting links within the global LNG trade network based on local information proximity, while the graph attention network, a deep learning model, exhibits stable optimization and effective feature learning. These findings suggest that machine learning approaches hold significant promise for mineral trade network analysis.

Indexed as

CommerceMachine LearningNatural GasAlgorithmsNatural Gas

Identifiers

PMID40737339
PMCPMC12310025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.