Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737308›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

CellMet: Extracting 3D shape and topology metrics from confluent cells within tissues.

Sophie Theis, Mario A Mendieta-Serrano, Bernardo Chapa-Y-Lazo, Juliet Chen, Timothy E Saunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie TheisCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-8153
Mario A Mendieta-SerranoCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Bernardo Chapa-Y-LazoCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Juliet ChenCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-8743-7127
Timothy E SaundersCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-0060

Funding

BBSRC BB/W006944/1NSF PHY-1748958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During development and tissue repair, cells reshape and reconfigure to ensure organs take specific shapes. This process is inherently three-dimensional (3D). Yet, in part due to limitations in imaging and data analysis, cell shape analysis within tissues has largely been studied in two-dimensions (2D), e.g., the Drosophila wing disc. With recent advances in imaging and machine learning, there has been significant progress in our understanding of 3D cell and tissue shape in vivo. However, even after gaining 3D segmentation of cells, it remains challenging to extract cell shape metrics beyond volume and surface area for cells within densely packed tissues. To address the challenge of extracting 3D cell shape metrics from dense tissues, we have developed the Python package CellMet. This user-friendly tool enables extraction of quantitative shape information from 3D cell and tissue segmentations, including cell face properties, cell twist, and cell rearrangements in 3D. Our method will improve the analysis of 3D cell shape and the understanding of cell organisation within tissues. Our tool is open source, available at https://github.com/TimSaundersLab/CellMet.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeImaging, Three-DimensionalSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophilaMachine LearningWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID40737308
PMCPMC12327599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.