Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737243›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Motivation and physical activity across Chinese adolescents: Based on latent profile analysis.

Ying Zhao, Qinghua Wu, Wei Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying ZhaoSchool of Physical Education and Health, Sanming University, Sanming, Fujian, China.
Qinghua WuGraduate School, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wei ZhengSchool of Physical Education and Health, Sanming University, Sanming, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4711-8956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite known links between motivation and physical activity, latent profiles of motivation among Chinese adolescents remain unexamined. Using the person-centered approach, this paper explores the relationship between adolescent motivation and physical activity. We aim to identify the latent motivation profiles and examine how these profiles differential predict physical activity (PA) levels, with attention to gender and age variations. This study recruited 571 adolescents (M age = 11.995, SD = 1.519) in southern China by the scale of Sport Motivation Scale and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. We conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) to classify motivation subgroups using Mplus. MANOVA and ANOVA were employed to compare PA differences across profiles, genders, and education levels. The results indicate that three profile model is the optimal model: Low Motivation-High Amotivation (8.45%), Moderate Motivation-High Amotivation (60.61%), and High Autonomous Motivation (30.94%). The subgroup with higher scores of intrinsic motivation and external motivation reported more PA. Moreover, male's PA is significantly more active than female adolescents, while older adolescents have less PA than younger adolescents. This study identified adolescents with different motivation profiles and PA. Findings suggest the need for more personalized strategies to promote adolescent participation in PA and provide a novel insight into intervention for adolescents with low motivation. Further research could be measured by objective methods and long-term design.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotivationAdolescentChildChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40737243
PMCPMC12310012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.