Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Human exposure to PM10 microplastics in indoor air.

Nadiia Yakovenko, Lucía Pérez-Serrano, Théo Segur, Oskar Hagelskjaer, Henar Margenat, Gaël Le Roux, Jeroen E Sonke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microplastics and Human Health: A Global Public Health Crisis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadiia YakovenkoGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-4710
Lucía Pérez-SerranoGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Théo SegurGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5435-6490
Oskar HagelskjaerGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Henar MargenatCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement, CNRS/INP/Université de Toulouse, Auzeville-Tolosane, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3650-963X
Gaël Le RouxCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement, CNRS/INP/Université de Toulouse, Auzeville-Tolosane, France.
Jeroen E SonkeGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence of airborne microplastics (MPs) in different indoor environments prompts serious concerns about the degree to which we inhale these particles and their potential impact on human health. Previous studies have mostly targeted MP in the 20-200 µm size range, which are less likely to efficiently penetrate into the lungs. In this study, we specifically investigate airborne, indoor suspended MPs in the inhalable 1-10 µm (MP1-10 µm) range in residential and car cabin environments, by using Raman spectroscopy. The median concentration of total suspended indoor MPs for the residential environment was 528 MPs/m3 and 2,238 MPs/m3 in the car cabin environment. The predominant polymer type in the residential environment was polyethylene (PE), and polyamide (PA) in the car cabin environment. Fragments were the dominant shape for 97% of the analyzed MPs, and 94% of MPs were smaller than 10 µm (MP1-10 µm), following a power size distribution law (the number of MP fragments increases exponentially as particle size decreases). We combine the new MP1-10 µm observations with published indoor MP data to derive a consensus indoor MP concentration distribution, which we use to estimate human adult indoor MP inhalation of 3,200 MPs/day for the 10-300 µm (MP10-300 µm) range, and 68,000 MPs/day for MP1-10 µm. The MP1-10 µm exposure estimates are 100-fold higher than previous estimates that were extrapolated from larger MP sizes, and suggest that the health impacts of MP inhalation may be more substantial than we realize.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental ExposureMicroplasticsParticulate MatterEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticle SizeAir PollutantsMicroplasticsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID40737229
PMCPMC12310009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.