Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40737171›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2025

Ashleigh Holmes, Sonia Humphris, Jacqueline Marshall, Yannick Rossez, Ian Toth, Nicola J Holden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashleigh HolmesCell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland, UK.
Sonia HumphrisCell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland, UK.
Jacqueline MarshallCell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland, UK.
Yannick RossezUniversité de Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France.
Ian TothCell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland, UK.
Nicola J HoldenDepartment of Rural Land Use, SRUC, Aberdeen, AB21 9YA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flagella are widely distributed appendages in bacteria with well-characterized functions in motility and chemotaxis. They also interact directly with hosts and, due to their ubiquity, are potent immune elicitors for hosts from both the plant and animal kingdoms. Furthermore, flagella have been shown to facilitate attachment for several different bacterial species, including several plant-associated bacteria to plant hosts. We previously demonstrated binding of flagella from

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionFlagellaPectobacteriumSolanum tuberosumBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliFlagellinPlant DiseasesPlant RootsBacterial ProteinsFlagellinflagellin proteinmembrane lipidsplant–microbe interactionspotatoTLC

Identifiers

PMID40737171
PMCPMC12310338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.