ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2025
Actual and Perceived Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer risk perception among family members of patients with digestive tract cancer and associated patient- and family member-related factors: A cross-sectional study of 414 patient-family member pairs.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with a family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of CRC. We aimed to assess the objective role and subjective perception of risk factors of colorectal neoplasia within this high-risk group.
methodsQuestionnaire and screening colonoscopy results were obtained from individuals aged 40-54 years with a reported FH of CRC in a first-degree relative in a multicenter cross-sectional study in Germany. Descriptive statistics characterized the cohort and distribution of risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate factors associated with colorectal neoplasia and with subjectively perceived increased CRC-risk.
resultsAmong 922 participants, 220 (23.9%) were diagnosed with colorectal neoplasia, 63 (6.8%) of these being advanced lesions. Strong associations with advanced neoplasia were observed for obesity (aOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.22), smoking (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14-1.88 per 10-pack-years) and physical activity <45 minutes per day (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.11-5.25). For smoking and physical activity, but not for obesity, similar associations were also seen with any colorectal neoplasia. No associations were seen with number and age at diagnosis of affected family members. By contrast, the latter factors, but none of the behavioral factors were strongly associated with subjectively perceived CRC-risk. DISCUSSION: Within a cohort of individuals aged 40-54 years with a FH of CRC, obesity, smoking, and lack of physical activity represented the most prominent modifiable risk factors for the development of advanced colorectal neoplasia but did not significantly impact risk perception in these high-risk participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.