ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Practical signal-to-noise ratio mapping using single clinical MR images.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a novel flexible, lightweight blanket-like torso coil in pediatric MRI at 1.5-T - initial experience.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurement is essential for evaluating image quality in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While the subtraction-map method provides precise SNR measurements, it requires two consecutive acquisitions, limiting its clinical applicability. This study aims to develop and validate a method for practical SNR measurement using clinical MRI images. The proposed method generates an SNR map by computing a noise-only image from a single MRI image using pixel shifting and edge component removal. The accuracy of our method was compared with the subtraction-map method in three evaluations: (1) optimization of a key parameter for edge component removal, (2) analysis of spatial resolution and SNR level effects, and (3) validation using brain MRI images. The study included brain MRI from 188 patients, and SNR measurements were performed on the resulting images. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used for comparisons. Parameter optimization identified an optimal threshold for separating noise and edge components. Higher spatial resolution improved accuracy, whereas lower resolution and low SNR conditions led to overestimation. In clinical MRI, the proposed method showed a strong correlation with the subtraction-map method (Spearman r = 0.96), and the highest average error rate was 8.1% in T1-weighted images. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement across sequences and regions. This method enables practical SNR estimation from a single image, eliminating the need for repeated acquisitions. While limitations remain in low-SNR or structurally complex regions, the method shows promise as a practical tool for retrospective and routine clinical image quality assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.