ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
A comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy in elderly patients undergoing segmentectomy and lobectomy for primary non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy in elderly patients undergoing segmentectomy or lobectomy for primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 129 patients aged 70 years or older who underwent anatomical lung resection (segmentectomy or lobectomy) for NSCLC between January 2016 and June 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: VATS and thoracotomy. Demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, chest drainage duration, hospital stay, and short- and mid-term mortality rates were analyzed and compared. The mean age of patients was 73.5 ± 3.2 years, with 55% undergoing surgery via VATS. The VATS group had significantly shorter chest drainage duration (median 4 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (median 6 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). Minor complications were more common in the thoracotomy group (p = 0.022), while no significant differences were found in major complications (p = 0.888). Thirty-day, ninety-day, one-year, and in-hospital mortality rates showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Both VATS and thoracotomy are viable surgical options for elderly NSCLC patients, with similar mortality and major morbidity rates. However, VATS provides advantages in terms of reduced chest drainage duration and shorter hospitalization. Surgical approach should be individualized, taking into account patient characteristics and surgical risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.