ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Applying the Classic Test dN/dS to Detect Selection in Archaea.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with the long history of research on Bacteria and Eukaryotes, Archaea are a young domain of study for life sciences. Before sequencing technologies, the scientific community primarily understood Archaea to be limited to extreme environments. However, it is now recognized that Archaea occupy a broad diversity of environments, including soil and marine habitats, where they play essential geochemical roles, as well as being animal and plant symbionts. Due to their late recognition as a new domain, the study of archaeal evolution has been delayed relative to Bacteria. Recent progress in high-throughput sequencing technologies has improved the accessibility of genomic data to broader phylogenetic breadths, including uncultivated clades. Here, we provide a step-by-step computational pipeline to estimate the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS), a measure of the strength and direction of selection on protein-coding genes. We focus our chapter on the estimation of dN/dS to disentangle the evolutionary forces acting on the core genome of archaeal genomes, but this workflow is also applicable to Bacteria. Importantly, we present an overview of the biases to consider when estimating dN/dS, as well as potential strategies to circumvent technical limitations. We describe a case example of the use of dN/dS to explore differences in the evolutionary constraints acting on different archaeal species belonging to the genus Methanosarcina. We provide custom Python scripts, which are freely available and applicable to a broad diversity of questions on the evolution of Archaea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736896What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.