ArticleBiological trace element research2025
Toxic Element Exposure and Bioactivity of Herbalist-Sourced Salvia officinalis: Comprehensive Health Risk Assessment from Eastern Türkiye.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salvia officinalis (sage) leaves were gathered from five districts in Van Province, Türkiye (İpekyolu, Erciş, Gevaş, Başkale, and Muradiye), and their antioxidant capacity, phenolic composition, heavy metal contamination, mineral content, and structural properties were investigated in this study. The widespread availability of Salvia officinalis in herbal shops and open markets across Türkiye, combined with its extensive use in traditional medicine, led to its selection. This study aimed to evaluate potential health risks associated with herbalist-sourced samples and to establish a model for assessing the safety of other unregulated medicinal plants sold in comparable environments. Elemental analysis was used to determine protein levels and the contents of C, N, and H. At the same time, a combination of analytical methods including ICP-OES, AAS, DUMAS method, and SEM-EDX was employed to determine levels of hazardous metals (Cr, Mn, Cd, As, Co, Fe, Pb, Zn, Cu) and essential minerals (Ca, Mg, Na, K). Antioxidant capacity was evaluated using DPPH, CUPRAC, and ABTS tests, and HPLC was used to identify the phenolic profiles. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content, especially gallic and vanillic acids, were higher in Sample S1 compared to other samples. Nevertheless, dangerous levels of heavy metals were also present. Sample S1 exhibited substantial carcinogenic (CR > 1 × 10⁻3) and non-carcinogenic (HI > 6) health hazards, according to health risk indicators such as estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotient (THQ), and hazard index (HI). This research demostrates that medicinal plants should undergo routine safety screening, especially those marketed through unregulated sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.