Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40736784›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2025

FERTILITY CARE IN LOW- AND MIDDLE- INCOME COUNTRIES: The future use of AI to improve accessibility of assisted reproductive technology in low- and middle-income countries.

Gerardo Mendizabal-Ruiz, Omar Paredes, Ernesto Borrayo, Alejandro Chavez-Badiola

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07308561 (The Relationship Between Quality of Life, Anxiety Levels, and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07308561 recruitingnot on this map

The Relationship Between Quality of Life, Anxiety Levels, and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled191ConditionsInfertility, Female, Artificial Intelligence, Quality of Life, Anxiety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerardo Mendizabal-RuizConceivable Life Sciences, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-4409
Omar ParedesLaboratorio de Innovación Biodigital, Departamento de Bioingeniería Traslacional, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-6127
Ernesto BorrayoLaboratorio de Innovación Biodigital, Departamento de Bioingeniería Traslacional, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-6721
Alejandro Chavez-BadiolaConceivable Life Sciences, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-4409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: People in low- and middle-income countries face many obstacles when trying to access fertility treatments. These challenges include high costs, the need for specialized medical facilities, and cultural beliefs that may discourage seeking help. This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI) and automation could help overcome some of these barriers and make fertility treatments more widely available. It examines how AI may improve the accuracy, efficiency, and consistency of different steps in fertility treatments, such as choosing the healthiest embryos, analyzing sperm, evaluating eggs, and planning treatment. The paper also discusses how automation could simplify laboratory procedures, from growing embryos and freezing them for future use to the possibility of fully automating the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, which could help lower costs and make these treatments more accessible. Finally, this paper addresses the ethical and practical challenges associated with using these technologies, including potential biases in AI, equitable access, quality control, data privacy, job implications, and cultural sensitivities. Lay summary: This paper explores how AI and automation could help make fertility treatments more accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many individuals and couples face difficulties conceiving, and assisted reproductive technology (ART) - which includes procedures such as intrauterine insemination (IUI) and IVF - offers them a chance to build a family. However, ART is often out of reach in LMICs due to high costs, the need for specialized medical facilities, and cultural barriers. AI and automation have the potential to improve accuracy, efficiency, and consistency in ART procedures, such as embryo selection, sperm and egg assessment, and treatment planning. Automation could also streamline laboratory processes, including embryo culture and freezing, which may eventually lead to more affordable and scalable fertility treatments. By reducing human error and dependence on highly trained specialists, AI-driven technologies could help lower costs and make ART available to more people. This paper also considers the ethical and practical challenges of using AI in reproductive medicine, including potential biases in AI algorithms, fairness in access to treatment, data privacy, workforce impact, and cultural sensitivities. Fertility treatments can be life-changing for those struggling with infertility due to medical conditions, age, or personal circumstances. They also provide opportunities for same-sex couples and individuals who want to start a family. However, in LMICs, infertility is often surrounded by social stigma, economic hardship, and limited medical resources, making access to ART even more difficult. By integrating AI and automation into reproductive medicine, it may be possible to break down these barriers, reduce costs, and create more inclusive and accessible fertility care. These advancements have the potential to bring hope to millions who dream of parenthood but currently lack the means to pursue it.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeveloping CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityInfertilityReproductive Techniques, AssistedFemaleHumansMaleARTartificial intelligenceautomationin vitro fertilizationstandardization

Identifiers

PMID40736784
PMCPMC12359024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.