ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Enhanced consent and patient counselling using virtual reality for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy: prospective outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo discover the effectiveness of VR in improving patient understanding and enhancing the consent procedure for patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). The primary outcomes measured include patient knowledge, pain perception, and emotional well-being.
methodsFor this prospective study (ERGO: 92019), patients with kidney stone disease (KSD) undergoing SWL were given a VR headset before their treatment. The VR glasses visually explained the SWL process (3 min) and its success and complications through an audio explanation linked to a 3D animation. The content followed the patient information leaflet (PIL) from European and British associations. Participants were provided with three questionnaires that covered pain, anxiety, and patient understanding of SWL via the VR enhanced consent (one questionnaire each).
results100 patients completed all three questionnaires. 68 patients reported an improved understanding of SWL with VR, and the overall improvement in patient understanding was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Participants also found the VR headset significantly more helpful and accessible and felt more confident explaining the procedure. 66 participants preferred VR to current teaching methods, and 81 firmly favoured using VR for future procedures. Findings also demonstrated a positive emotional impact, with participants reporting more positive and fewer negative emotions after VR use.
conclusionOur study showed that incorporating VR into the consent process effectively improves patient understanding and experience, with widespread approval. VR improved the psychological well-being of patients undergoing surgical procedures, highlighting the potential for VR to play a significant role in enhancing consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.