ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
PLMFit: benchmarking transfer learning with protein language models for protein engineering.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- EmmaEmb: A quantitative framework for analyzing embedding spaces in molecular biology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- AbTune: layer-wise selective fine-tuning of protein language models for antibodies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PEPE: scalable extraction of multi-modal protein language model representations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Dissecting serum polyclonal antibody escape to SARS-CoV-2 variants by deep mutational learning.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Fitness Landscape for Antibodies 2: Benchmarking Reveals That Protein AI Models Cannot Yet Consistently Predict Developability Properties.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Medium-sized protein language models perform well at transfer learning on realistic datasets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Medium-sized protein language models perform well at transfer learning on realistic datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein language models (PLMs) have emerged as a useful resource for protein engineering applications. Transfer learning (TL) leverages pre-trained parameters to extract features to train machine learning models or adjust the weights of PLMs for novel tasks via fine-tuning (FT) through back-propagation. TL methods have shown potential for enhancing protein predictions performance when paired with PLMs, however there is a notable lack of comparative analyses that benchmark TL methods applied to state-of-the-art PLMs, identify optimal strategies for transferring knowledge and determine the most suitable approach for specific tasks. Here, we report PLMFit, a benchmarking study that combines, three state-of-the-art PLMs (ESM2, ProGen2, ProteinBert), with three TL methods (feature extraction, low-rank adaptation, bottleneck adapters) for five protein engineering datasets. We conducted over >3150 in silico experiments, altering PLM sizes and layers, TL hyperparameters and different training procedures. Our experiments reveal three key findings: (i) utilizing a partial fraction of PLM for TL does not detrimentally impact performance, (ii) the choice between feature extraction (FE) and fine-tuning is primarily dictated by the amount and diversity of data, and (iii) FT is most effective when generalization is necessary and only limited data is available. We provide PLMFit as an open-source software package, serving as a valuable resource for the scientific community to facilitate the FE and FT of PLMs for various applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.