ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
Current grading of prostate cancer.
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An artificial intelligence solution for evaluation of prostate needle core biopsy specimens: impact in a non-specialist setting.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Comparative Histological Quantification of Prostate Cancer on Surgical Specimens.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Gleason grading system is the cornerstone of risk stratification and clinical decision-making in prostate cancer patients. In the last decade, new insights on quantitative grading and the importance of particular growth patterns have further optimized pathological tumor grading. This review provides an update on the latest grading recommendations and discusses contemporary research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.