Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40736701›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025

The Administration of an Expectation Survey at a Pain Medicine Clinic to Improve Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Study.

Emmanuella Borukh, Phuong Nguyen, Geum Yeon Sim, Jasal Patel, Andrew Bloomfield, Sarang S Koushik, Jagun Raghavan, Omar Viswanath, Kevin Zacharoff, Kateryna Slinchenkova and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emmanuella BorukhYeshiva University, New York City, NY, USA. eborukh@mail.yu.edu.
Phuong NguyenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Geum Yeon SimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jasal PatelDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Andrew BloomfieldDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Sarang S KoushikValleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jagun RaghavanThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Omar ViswanathMountain View Headache and Spine Institute, Creighton University School of Medicine, LSU Shreveport Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Shreveport, USA.
Kevin ZacharoffDepartment of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Kateryna SlinchenkovaNew York Medical Collegem, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Karina GritsenkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Regional Anesthesia & Acute Pain Medicine Fellowship Program, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Naum ShaparinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Multidisciplinary Pain Program, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPatients' expectations are important aspects to consider for improving patients' satisfaction and willingness to return for continued care. While expectation surveys are not novel in Pain Medicine, none specifically aim to improve satisfaction. This study evaluates whether administering an expectation survey during an initial pain clinic visit improves satisfaction with treatment plans and outcomes. We hypothesized that completing the survey could increase awareness and help align expectations and satisfaction. RECENT

findingsThis study was conducted at an outpatient multidisciplinary pain clinic at an urban academic hospital and 100 first-time, English speaking adult patients were recruited. Fifty patients completed a pre-visit questionnaire on pain and expectations (intervention group), while 50 did not (control group). A follow-up survey was completed six months later by 85% of participants to assess satisfaction level with pain treatment, meeting of goals and expectations, and overall clinic experience. No significant differences were found between intervention and control groups for pain treatment satisfaction (3.46 ± 1.31 vs. 3.50 ± 1.28, p = 0.48), goal achievement (3.76 ± 1.14 vs. 3.49 ± 1.20, p = 0.30), or overall experience (3.83 ± 1.20 vs. 3.72 ± 1.14, p = 0.67). Dissatisfaction stemmed from inadequate pain relief, lack of follow-up, and unmet expectations. The lack of statistical significance suggests that merely assessing expectations without patient education or provider engagement may be insufficient. Future studies could explore how patient education, communication, and treatment understanding can impact satisfaction to potentially improve pain management experiences.

Indexed as

Pain ClinicsPain ManagementPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesExpectationExpectation surveyPain managementQuality improvementSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40736701
PMCPMC12310763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.