ArticleJournal of natural medicines2025
Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice.
Article in Journal of natural medicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we explored the anti-allergic actions of 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acids (18α-GA and 18β-GA), to compare the pharmacological properties of these stereoisomers and to clarify the immunopharmacological contribution of 18α-glycyrrhizin in licorice. 18β-GA exhibited anti-allergic effects in murine models of contact dermatitis and IgE-mediated immediate allergic dermatitis, whereas 18α-GA showed no such effects. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this variation, the blood concentrations of 18α-GA and 18β-GA were measured after the oral administration of both compounds; we detected only 18β-GA in sera. We also demonstrated that considerable amounts of 18α-GA remained in the small intestine, which indicates low absorption of 18α-GA from the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, 18α-GA, like 18β-GA, directly suppressed IgE-mediated degranulation in RBL-2H3, and both showed equivalent clearance after intravenous administration. In conclusion, 18α-GA was not absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract in mice and did not exhibit the anti-allergic actions exhibited by 18β-GA. To clarify the differences in absorbability between these two compounds further research focusing on the gastrointestinal absorption of 18β-GA is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40736665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.