ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Fixating on a laser-projected point at a constant distance suppresses periodic eye movements and impairs balance control during cycling.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of instructions regarding gaze direction on stability of movements and accuracy of trajectory control during cycling.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual field is influenced by movements of the body, head, and eye movements during self-motion. Therefore, compensatory eye movements that stabilize the visual field are crucial for perceptual-motor control. In cycling, a type of eye movement known as optokinetic nystagmus may help prevent visual blur and support the use of retinal flow for maintaining dynamic balance. This study aimed to examine the impact of visual environmental manipulation on dynamic balance control in cycling by altering gaze behavior. Participants cycled under three conditions and were instructed to ride as slowly as possible while staying on the path. In the control condition, they cycled along a striped path. In the laser condition, they cycled on the same path while fixating on a laser point projected 4 m ahead of the bicycle. In the monochrome condition, participants cycled along a plain white path. Each condition consisted of five trials. The results showed that the amplitude at the peak frequency of eye movements was significantly lower in the laser condition compared to the control and monochrome conditions. In addition, the cycling distance and duration were significantly shorter in the laser condition compared to the control condition. There were no significant differences in eye movements or cycling performance between the control and monochrome conditions. These results suggest that fixating on a laser point projected at a constant distance ahead suppresses the amplitude of eye movements and impairs balance control during cycling. Natural gaze behavior is likely to be an important factor for cycling safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.