Observational studyAnnals of hematology2025
Real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: primary results of a French multicentre observational study (NAOS).
Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Multicentre experience.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Rare CNS manifestation of high-risk CLL with excellent response to triplet targeted therapy.Leukemia research reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acalabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) after demonstrating efficacy and safety in clinical trials. NAOS, a real-world study, complements these trials with real-world (rw) acalabrutinib data generated from clinical practice. This retrospective, non-interventional, longitudinal study was conducted in 59 sites in France in adult patients initiating acalabrutinib for CLL in 2021-2022.The study assessed rw use (time to discontinuation, TTD) and effectiveness (rw progression free survival, rwPFS) in first line (L1) and relapsed/refractory setting (L2+). At the time of the analysis, data were collected from routine medical records since the treatment start up to the end of 2022. Of the 485 enrolled patients, 58.8% were in L1 and 41.2% in L2+. Median age was 73 (L1) and 77 (L2+) years. Of them, 55.1% had a prior cardiovascular history, 25.1% del(17p)/TP53m, and 67.4% were uIGHV. Among 188 patients initiated in 2021 (119 L1; 69 L2+), 31.4% discontinued treatment, 14.9% of whom due to adverse event (AE). The 12-month rwPFS rate was 93.1% (88.5-97.7) in L1 and 87% (79.0-94.9) in L2 + patients with no significant difference based on del17p/TP53m (p = 0.21) and on IGHV status (p = 0.34). AEs leading to treatment changes occurred in 40 patients (21.3%), grade 3/4 AE in 9.6%, while cardiac disorders occurred in only 2.1% of patients. NAOS, one of the largest real-world cohorts of acalabrutinib-treated CLL patients in Europe, showed effectiveness and safety consistent with clinical trials, despite an older population with more cardiovascular comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.