Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40736352›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

Improved Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins through FDR-Control of Peptide-Identity-Propagation.

Alexander J Solivais, Hannah Boekweg, Lloyd M Smith, William S Noble, Michael R Shortreed, Samuel H Payne, Uri Keich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Omics Technology in Food Flavor.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander J SolivaisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7282-8809
Hannah BoekwegDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Lloyd M SmithDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
William S NobleDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-4715
Michael R ShortreedDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-0863
Samuel H PayneDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Uri KeichSchool of Mathematics and Statistics F07, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3209-5011

Funding

Revealing Proteoforms: The Primary Effectors of Biological FunctionR35GM126914 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lloyd M Smith · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
Enhanced Sensitivity and Quantitative Precision for Single Cell ProteomicsR01GM147653 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI PAYNE, SAMUEL H, SHORTREED, MICHAEL R · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147653NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of proteomics is to identify and quantify peptides and proteins within a biological sample. Almost all algorithms for the identification of peptides in LC-MS/MS data employ two steps: peptide/spectrum matching and peptide-identity-propagation (PIP), also known as match-between-runs. PIP can routinely account for up to 40% of all results, with that proportion rising as high as 75% in single-cell proteomics. Unlike peptide identities derived through peptide/spectrum matches, for which error estimation has been strictly enforced for decades, peptide identities derived through PIP have not historically been subject to statistical evaluation. As an indispensable component of label-free quantification, PIP needs a statistically rigorous method for estimating its false-discovery rate (FDR). We present a method for FDR control of PIP, called PIP-ECHO, and devise a rigorous protocol for evaluating FDR control of any PIP method. Using three different benchmark data sets, we evaluate PIP-ECHO alongside the PIP procedures implemented by FlashLFQ, IonQuant, and MaxQuant. These analyses show that only PIP-ECHO can accurately control the FDR of PIP at 1% across all data sets. When analyzing a spike-in data set, PIP-ECHO increases both the accuracy and sensitivity of differential expression analysis, yielding substantially more differentially abundant proteins than either MaxQuant or IonQuant.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsAlgorithmsChromatography, LiquidHumansTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesfalse-discovery rateFDRlabel-free quantificationmatch-between-runspeptide-identity-propagation

Identifiers

PMID40736352
PMCPMC12488043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.