ArticleCancer medicine2025
Providers' and Survivors' Perspectives on Affordability Challenges for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment in Two Low Socioeconomic Status States of the Southern United States.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on Education From Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancer Patients in the Deep South: Qualitative Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the patient: how providers perceive and experience non-medical barriers in gastrointestinal cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Providers' and Survivors' Perspectives on Affordability Challenges for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment in Two Low Socioeconomic Status States of the Southern United States.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAffordability is an access to care domain contributing to disparities in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer outcomes and care, including surgical care. Affordability challenges for GI cancer care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and diverse states of the southern United States are unknown: this paper addresses this knowledge gap.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 providers (13 surgeons and 19 other) and 36 survivors (53% colorectal, 19% pancreatic, and 28% esophageal cancer) in Alabama and Mississippi. Questions were about barriers and facilitators to surgical care along five domains, including affordability, that is, the relationship between health care costs, patients' income, health insurance coverage, and the resulting ability to afford care. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic and content analysis.
resultsThemes were about: (1) affordability-related underlying context, that is, (i) patients' limited means and competing basic needs priorities, (ii) scarcity of quality medical services, and (iii) rural hospitals' limited means; (2) barriers to medical decision-making, that is, (i) guideline-concordant care unfeasible due to poverty and (ii) insurance authorizations and coverage delaying and making care costlier; (3) economic burdens from (i) many types of needed expenses and (ii) billing; and (4) strategies to improve affordability, that is, (i) care adjustments to reduce patients' costs, (ii) community organizations' support, and (iii) burdensome access to resources.
conclusionsUnderlying poverty, scarce quality medical services, and restrictive insurance provisions significantly impact medical decision-making, access to quality and prompt care, and economic and administrative burdens. Future research should quantify the extent of these challenges and identify programs and policies to address them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.