Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40736154›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026

Intraspecific variation of cochlear morphology in bowhead and beluga whales.

John Peacock, J G M Thewissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John PeacockDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-2509
J G M ThewissenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation EAR-2142526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bony labyrinth of the petrosal bone, a distinctive feature of mammal skulls, is often identified in micro-computed tomography imaging to infer species' physiological and ecological traits. When done as part of a comparative study, one individual specimen is normally considered representative of a species, and intraspecific variation is considered low. Yet tests of intraspecific variability have been performed on few species and on limited morphological traits. Studies of intraspecific variability are not only valuable to help us assess the need for multiple specimens in comparative work, but relative levels of variability can also be used to reveal insights into a trait's functional significance. In this study, we report measurements of intraspecific variation on two cetaceans with vastly different auditory specializations, a low-frequency specialized mysticete and an echolocating odontocete. We examine the internal structures of the cochlea in beluga and bowhead whales and relate this to their hearing abilities. Overall levels of intraspecific variability are higher in the bowhead than the beluga, reflecting the more specialized auditory system of the latter. However, the levels of variation differ through the length of the cochlea (base to apex) and these appear to reflect known frequency specializations of the species, with the bowhead having lower variation in some measurements at the low-frequency apical end than the beluga.

Indexed as

Beluga WhaleBowhead WhaleCochleaAnimalsHearingSpecies Specificitybelugabowheadcochleahearingintraspecific variation

Identifiers

PMID40736154
PMCPMC13138370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.